Sunday, September 25, 2005

What does it mean to be an American?

Michael Ignatieff writes eloquently in this week's NYT magazine about what it means to be American and what all of us deserve from our government. He writes "A contract of citizenship defines the duties of care that public officials owe to the people of a democratic society."

On the op-ed page Nicholas Kristof details the failure of our health care system to provide basic needs to all Americans. (can't link to it, because of the a glitch in the Times Select system)

Also on the op-ed page, David Brooks details the failure of our institutions of higher education to open the opportunity of a college education to all Americans. He argues that the real root cause of the widening divide between rich and poor is the divide between college and no college. (can't link - same Times Select problem)

I the early and mid 20th century, many immigrants came to this country in search of the American ideal. They were determined to lose their accents and buy in to American institutions. Working class joined unions and their children went to college. Public higher education provided affordable entry to the upper, educated class.

David Brooks hits on something when he writes

Part of the problem is that kids from poorer families have trouble
affording higher education. But given the rising flow of aid money,
financial barriers are not the main issue. A lot of it has to do with
being academically prepared, psychologically prepared and culturally prepared
for college.


What does it mean to be culturally prepared for college? Given the intersection of class and race and education, is this thickly veiled racism? Is it a thinly veiled indictment of "cultural diversity" initiatives? It is time for liberals to reclaim the moral high ground and declare that we demand a government that is an efficient mechanism for provision of basic, baseline, non-negotiable services to all Americans, such as health care. But is it also time for liberals to admit that there is a baseline of shared American cultural values that includes being culturally prepared for college? Does that have to mean to some extent buying out of ethnic, religious, cultural racial diversity?

Not new concepts, just food for thought, but similar questions came up for me a few weeks ago watching a documentary of PBS's POV "
The Hobart Shakespeareans." A fifth grade teacher in California teaches his class in a tough immigrant neighborhood to perform Shakespeare. He also takes them on a yearly class trip to Washington DC to show them what it means to be American and to colleges to show them what, as Americans, they have the right to strive for.

The question comes down to: Is the contract of citizenship for every American or only for those that share a common denominator of American Values? It is easy to argue what the government's side of the bargain is, but what is ours?

Saturday, September 24, 2005

More on Mom vs. Career

Slate has a nice piece about the methodology used in the NYT article. It also links to feedster detailing the number of blogs linked to that NYT story. I don't think I am on the list, even though I did link to it.

Friday, September 23, 2005

What a good idea

This from the winners of the lottery in NJ this week:


Harold Lerner said he would buy a yellow Checker taxi, a reminder of his childhood in Brooklyn, and give anyone who wanted one a free ride.

Turns out the reporter was NBC's David Gregory

This is from the NBC Nightly News blog, written by David Gregory about today's interaction with Bush.

During his visit to FEMA emergency operations center here in Washington
today, I asked the President what good he thinks he could do traveling to the
hurricane zone later today in anticipation of Rita. He initially brushed off
questions, but then spun around to say, "We will make sure that my entourage
does not get in the way of people doing their job."
What a difference a
botched hurricane makes!
The same President who appeared just a tad aloof
taking in Katrina's wrath from Air Force One, or strumming a guitar after a
speech as Katrina was striking, is now desperately seeking a new photo
opportunity to symbolize his stewardship in response to Rita.
Then we
received late word today that Mr. Bush has scrapped his trip to San Antonio
where he was going to visit search and rescue teams staging for the storm. Those
teams are moving east to follow the storm track and the White House says the
President didn't want to slow that down. Mr. Bush will ride out the storm in
Colorado at Northern Command to view the military response to Rita.

The Greatest Place on Earth

is electing a Mayor in November. Here are the websites of our candidates Mike Bloomberg and Fernando Ferrer. As I see it, the choice is clear. Ferrer, in one of the democratic primary debates, called Bloomberg a "caretaker mayor," charging him with not moving the city forward in his term. Well, he's had the good sense not to repeat that statement, as far as I can tell. After 9/11, caretaking is what the city needed. There are a number of problems worsening on Bloomberg's watch, no doubt. There are noticably more homeless. The gap between the rich and the poor is widening. There is nowhere left to live. In Manhattan, apartments cost an average of $1150 a square foot (!!!) But on the other hand, the NYPD is looked to by the Feds at times for superior anti-terrorism intelligence. And I want to feel safe at night.

Re-elect Bloomberg.

A Quick Pick Me Up. No, it's not Rockie.

This is Rockie!

Our in the way president

After meeing with FEMA officials in Washington DC today, a reporter asked the president about his plans to go to San Antonio to meet with First Responders then on to NorthComm staging area in Colorado. He was asked what he was going to do there and would he just "get in the way?' He's proven useless as a leader on the ground. This is accepted to the point that he is thought just to be in the way. Within the hour, change of plans was announced. He'll skip San Antonio and straight on to Colorado.

Thursday, September 22, 2005

Clearly?

A Slate Magazine article rips the use of "many" as a weasel word to hide the lack of data. I am studying bioethics and have noticed that "clearly" is similarly over- and mis- used to describe concepts that are anything but clear.

Lessons Learned

And we do have buses.

Real women weigh in on the Mom and Career issue

See readers' letters in NYT. Some sanity.

Wednesday, September 21, 2005

Breathless

I don't know about you , but I didn't breathe for what felt like the last 3 minutes watching the JetBlue airliner with a sideways facing front wheel land safely.

website of the governor of Texas

Does have some Hurrican Rita info.

Send in the Buses

Round 2. And we are all again watching satellite images, prediction maps, checking out what FEMA is doing (asking us to pay attention, but we are the one's who watch TV and knew about the NO convention center 24 hours earlier than they did), what the president is doing (still behind the times in La.), what the State of Texas is doing (nothing on the website), what DHS is doing (all Katrina, no Rita)
and
hoping and praying that someone sends in some buses, because I am sure their are poor people in Texas that could use some help too.

Half a happy ending?

Things in NOLA must be a lot worse than the horror they seem to be in the news coverage of the last 3 weeks if this is any of a happy ending. This
"We have half a happy ending," Keller said. "That's pretty good these days."

is the last line of the story.

Geniuses

Here they are. Pretty cool.

Pipe Dream?

I renew my proposal for a Clinton (Hillary) - McCain Presidential Ticket in 2008.

Tuesday, September 20, 2005

Motherhood precludes becoming famous Yale grad

Check out this story in today's NYT. Apparently the time off from work to be with kids significantly lowers one's chances of becoming famous.


Also, Tierney in the op-ed page suggests replacing FEMA with Wal-mart. Is the only incentive to help other pwople in our country economic self interest? I doubt that Wal-mart acts solely altruistically and expects to gain financially from the image. Can no government agency ever run efficiently solely becuase it is a government agency? Is the only way around government inefficiency to leave us all in the hands of the private sector? Is there no person available to lead our government with only the incentive of helping other people? Is Mike Bloomberg close? He brings a CEO mind and efficiency. Use the comments button to let me know what you think.

Monday, September 19, 2005

New Blog

Here is my new endeavor, a blog. I am always late in adopting popular culture. But I can no longer keep it all in. I hope you find this interesting, funny, informative, etc.